WHAT SHOULD BE
FAITHFUL DOCTRINE?
INTRODUCTIONNo
one can deny the immense religious confusion that exists in our time.
But
the confusion is not limited only to what group membership, but also what to
believe. The
work of false teachers, error and ignorance of God's will, has wreaked havoc not
only in terms of the lack of seriousness that you have when it comes to putting
on a church membership, but has also been doing a lot damage to the biblical doctrine.
Many
people believe that not only can meet at any church and to please God, but also
believe that any doctrine is good.Many
who are aware of this phenomenon, try alert from the very error that sectarian
move, however, in his attempt to get people to practice a healthy faith guide
you from one mistake to another, leaving them in the same spiritual situation
fall in
which they found themselves.For all
these reasons we ask, what doctrine we must be faithful? If
we have the correct answer it, it is then that we will be protected against
error, false doctrine and bad churches.
Should
I be faithful to the fundamental doctrines of historic
Christianity?The
so-called "doctrine of historic Christianity" is the path that many follow
advise, to be free from error. But is
this the way forward? Nothing is further from the
truth.Before
describing the error behind the "doctrine of historic Christianity", we should
note why many advise following this path. As
said earlier, the religious world has been watching invaded by a number of new
religious movements rather strange, not only the Bible, but the old
Protestantism. The
denominationsWhat doctrine should
be faithful?
old
and conservative, who strive to be faithful to their creed, are being infected
by outbreaks of subjectivism and false manifestations fabulous as various holy
laughter and bizarre miracles. That's
where various religious organizations belonging to the old Protestantism, making
the call for believers to be faithful and persevere in the "doctrine of historic
Christianity." The
purpose of the call is good and worthy of imitation, but ultimately is asked to
live in error. In an error
"old" or "historical", but still error.Why
I say that is still living in the error, to be faithful to "the fundamental
doctrines of historic Christianity"? Well,
to understand why this truth, we must ask, what are "the fundamental doctrines
of historic Christianity"? The answer is simple.
This is the "set
of doctrines of historic Protestantism." We
must remember that Protestantism began with the reform movement, but it was just
that, a reform, not a restore the faith of those who were immersed in the
darkness of Roman Catholicism. The
truth is that "the fundamental doctrines of historic Christianity," is a phrase
that hides the error, and that is not sound doctrine, but of the doctrines
taught by Luther, Calvin, and many others. But many of the
doctrines of these men are not biblical! Those
who persevere in "the fundamental doctrines of historic Christianity," will not
persevere in the truth but in error.Here's
an example of the fundamental doctrines of historic
Christianity:1. The one faith to be
saved.2. The inheritance of sin.These
two brief examples suffice to show that "the fundamental doctrines of historic
Christianity," that is, Protestantism old unbiblical. Does the Bible
teach that a man is justified by faith alone? No,
"... You see then that a man is justified by works and not by faith alone ..."
(James 2:24). The
evangelical and so famous phrase, "by faith alone" is found only
onceWhat doctrine should be faithful?
Lorenzo Salas Luevano3in
the New Testament, but, oddly enough, this contradicts biblical phrase "the
fundamental doctrine of historic Christianity", ie Protestantism. Now, the Bible teaches that
man inherits sin? No,
because, "... the son shall not bear the iniquity of the father ..." (Ezq.
18:20). Sin is something we do,
not inherited (1 Jn. 3:4). Thus,
the ancient doctrines of Protestantism, instead of leading us to the light of
truth and protect us from error that prevails around us, leads to doctrines,
yes, but good historical false doctrines.Should
I be faithful to the different traditions of Orthodox
Christianity?There
are many others trying to reach safety innovations in sectarianism, decide to be
faithful to the different "traditions of Orthodox Christianity." And
of course, the word "Orthodox" plays an important role in the decision.
But
did not realize that the word "orthodoxy" will remain ambiguous, especially with
the variety of meanings that exist? For
example, the Ocean One Encyclopedic Dictionary, says of orthodoxy, "...
Righteousness dogmatic or conformity with Catholic dogma ..." and also, "... in
accordance with the fundamental doctrine of any sect or system. .. ". Should
we be faithful to the religious traditions of sectarianism? Every
sect has "its fundamental doctrines," and each group will present, according to
his understanding, "the set of fundamental doctrines" and then claim that
fidelity to his doctrine, is an example of orthodoxy.Religious
traditions, such as the millennium, the end times, etc.., Primitive
Protestantism, does not support what the Bible teaches. So,
who is faithful to the different traditions of Orthodox Christianity, will,
again, immersed in the error and the confusion of trying to get
out.Who will hear the
advice?It
is true that many people are tired of the sectarianism that error and see around
you, but how will get rid of the historic creeds and religious traditions that
offer a way to(2
Tim. 4:2), while the doctrine of historic Christianity and 6:3), is healthy
(Titus 2:1), is useful for teaching, rebuking, rebuking and exhorting What
doctrine should be faithful? Lorenzo Salas
Luevano4heaven, but in reality leads
to destruction? You must follow the correct advice.
Not
mine, not that of a preacher, pastor, prophet, guru, enlightened or give angel,
but the Bible counsel.What does the Bible say?
The
Bible says that if we do not follow the correct doctrine, never be able to give
our heart and have fences of God (Matt. 15:8, 9). Also
urges us not to cling to the traditions of men (Mark 7:8), for the same impede
our obedience to God's will. The
doctrines of men and their traditions, are but the product of their will, not
the will of God (2 Peter 1:21)Be faithful to the doctrine
of Christ!We
must be faithful to "the fundamental doctrines of early Christianity", or "the
various traditions of Orthodox Christianity", but the doctrine of Christ.
Those
who follow the doctrine of Christ, has God and the Savior (2 Jn.: 9), but who
follow the doctrines of Protestantism, or modern sectarianism, not God, since,
various doctrines of such movements are not as the Word of God. The
doctrine of Christ has authority (Luke 4:32), it is the doctrine of God (John
17:16), but the doctrine of Protestantism old and the new, has no authority, it
originates in men, and depends
on cunning and use the wiles of error (Eph. 4:14). The
doctrine of Christ is to be retained (2 Thes. 2:15), Old Protestantism and
modern sectarianism should be rejected (1 Tim. 1:3), because opposes sound
doctrine (1 Tim. 1:3 ). The
doctrine of Christ is good (1 Tim. 4:6), keeps us in salvation (1 Tim. 4:16), is
according to godliness (1 Tim. Traditions of Orthodox Christianity, this
accomplishes nothing.CONCLUSIONLet us be faithful to the
doctrine of Christ! You
will not find a creed, or articles of faith of certain Church nor will be
revealed by a prophet, dream or modern gift. Not
be found in books on theology, history or certain Church teaching, but only
andvolviendoalabiblia.com.mxWhat doctrine should be faithful?
Lorenzo Salas Luevano5exclusively, in the New Testament.
This is
where we find the doctrine to which we must be faithful. That's where infallible creed. That's
where the healthy, good, perfect and infallible doctrine. The
doctrine of the apostles (Acts 2:42), which is the doctrine of Christ (3 Jn.: 9;
Mt 28:18-20), is when we must persevere (Acts 2:42), retain (2
Thes. 2:15), obey from the heart (Rom. 6:17), agree with it (Titus 2:1), adorn
(Titus 2:10), caring (1 Tim. 4:16) and not tripped and
divisions against it (Rom. 16:17). So, what is true doctrine you?
...Lorenzo Salas LuevanoJanuary, 2007.
No hay comentarios.:
Publicar un comentario